Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2010-04-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2010-04-14 House Journal Page 2296 SB 110 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 110(FIN) "An Act relating to the preservation of evidence and to the DNA identification system." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT HCS(JUD) NT 6DP 2111 TITLE CHANGE: HCR 25 2111 FN4: ZERO(S.FIN/DPS) 2112 FN5: ZERO(DPS) 2112 FN6: (LAW) 2112 FIN RPT HCS(FIN) NT 6DP 5NR 2229 TITLE CHANGE: HCR 25 2229 FN4: ZERO(S.FIN/DPS) 2230 FN5: ZERO(DPS) 2230 FN7: ZERO(H.FIN/LAW) 2230 2010-04-14 House Journal Page 2297 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 110(FIN) "An Act relating to post-conviction DNA testing, to the preservation of certain evidence, and to the DNA identification registration system; relating to post-conviction relief procedures; relating to representation by the public defender; amending Rule 35.1, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 110(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 110(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 110(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 110(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, N.Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson And so, HCS CSSB 110(FIN) passed the House. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2010-04-14 House Journal Page 2298 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 110(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.